The Ottawa Senators Brady Tkachuk is one of the more exciting young players in the NHL. He has the size, the skill, and most of all the desire to do well. That fact was recognized when he was named one of the youngest captains in the NHL.
But there remain questions about Tkachuk’s game. One of them was brought up by the Hockey Night in Canada between-periods broadcast on the weekend.
The Hockey Night in Canada Panel Noted Tkachuk’s Frequent Penalties
The question that was raised was whether Tkachuk needed to dial back his frequency of fights. For the panel, that question has become a prominent topic. While Tkachuk is undoubtedly one of the most entertaining players to watch, his pace for 255 penalty minutes raises concerns. That’s true, especially considering the significant gap in his penalty minutes from others in the NHL.
In the number of penalties he takes, he’s a huge anomaly. Over recent years, it’s odd for a player to take so many fighting penalties. Last year’s leader, Patrick Maroon, amassed “only” around 150 minutes, emphasizing the rarity of Tkachuk’s current trajectory.
Reflecting on historical players like Brady’s father, Keith Tkachuk, who (interestingly) had a season with 255 penalty minutes. That said, the game has evolved since then. Brendan Shanahan, known for his scoring prowess, had seasons with 100 points and yet maintained a different style of play. He had tons of penalty minutes according to the panel. But he too is a dinosaur in that regard.
However, Tkachuk’s penchant for fighting, often in response to hits he dislikes, adds a layer of frustration to his season. For the panel, it also raises questions about his role as a leader.
Should Tkachuk – As the Senators’ Captain – Be the One to Fight?
As the captain and best scorer for his team, the panel wondered why Tkachuk felt compelled to take on this responsibility himself. They believe it’s a delicate balance between appreciating his fiery intensity and considering the potential impact on his teammates. The recent double fight, sparked by a hit he didn’t appreciate, adds complexity to the discussion.
While it’s clear Tkachuk is venting and standing up for himself, there’s an exploration (specifically by Kevin Bieksa) of whether his teammates should share this burden and why he feels the need to be the sole enforcer.
This situation prompts contemplation about Tkachuk’s evolution as a leader. Perhaps, as the panel suggests, it’s time for him to shift his leadership style. No one wants to diminish his intensity. However, the panel noted that he should be adding different layers to his role as the team leader.
For them, it’s about finding a balance between being a fiery presence on the ice and ensuring he doesn’t shoulder the entire responsibility of enforcing and protecting his team.
